104 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 11 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
No description yet. Lineage only shows one with its source.
Operated in: Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Ghana, Pakistan, Nepal, Central Asia, Vietnam, Tanzania, Morocco, Paraguay, Mozambique, Senegal, Dominican Republic, Mali, Nigeria, Namibia, Malawi, Zambia, Africa South of Sahara, Latin America, Indonesia.
Years
2017 to 2023 award start, end from document years
Implementer
DAI Global, LLC; International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) 9 sources
Funder or award
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); OAA-A-17-00033; 367-A-16-00008
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 1.
evidence countries (19): Bangladesh 2, Kenya 2, India 2, Indonesia 1, Vietnam 1, Nepal 1; top share 0.33, single-country share 0.17; regions -> global +2
award office OAA (USAID/Washington) -> global +1
dropped Ukraine tag on 1 Africa-context docs (taxonomy defect)
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2017. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Political competition and consensus-building 31%; Good governance 19%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 9%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
SecurityDEC topic tag, PA-00Z-K5H, PA-00W-RBB and 3 more, 2020 to 2023, confidence 0.999; 7 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
assessment3
Feed the Future Bangladesh digital agriculture assessment follow-on : an updated review of the agtech landscape for Feed the Future PA-00W-RBBAssessment 2020
Vietnam digital innovation ecosystem analysis PA-00X-2W4Assessment 2020
USAID/Nepal Digital Agriculture Ecosystem Assessment PA-00Z-822 2020
policy strategy1
USAID POLICY ON PROMOTING THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.