Global programs / Coral Triangle support partnership (CTSP)
Key awd:LAG-A-99-00048
181 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 1 support mechanism (not programs); 413 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program is a USAID-funded five-year project that provides technical support to the CT6.1 The program was developed by USAID's Regional Development Mission for Asia in cooperation with bilateral USAID Missions in Indonesia, Timor-Leste, and the Philippines.2 WWF is the cooperative agreement leader for the program.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Africa, Tanzania, Kenya, Papua New Guinea, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Nepal, Pakistan, Haiti, Asia, Philippines, Gabon, Southern Africa, East Africa, South Africa, Southern Hemisphere, Solomon Islands, Africa South of Sahara, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Zimbabwe, Timor-Leste, Central African Republic, Republic of the Congo, Indonesia, Malawi, Madagascar, Mozambique, Central Africa, Nepal, Malaysia, Rwanda, South Sudan, Peru.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Low confidence.
How sure we are: 0.533.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 298 sources |
| World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (WWF-U.S.) | implementer | 2002 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 118 sources |
Contracts and vehicles that served this program (evaluation, M&E, research). Never counted as programs. Source: document metadata
A support mechanism is never counted as a program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAG-A-99-00048 (cooperative agreement, FY1999) | 2002 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 767 sources |
| RLA-A-07-00043 (cooperative agreement, FY2007) | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 692 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 47%; Environment, general policy and planning 21%; Program management, planning and administration 4%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| An evaluation of potential bushmeat alternatives in Equatorial Guinea | 2010 | PA-00K-423 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) (New York, NY) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 56 sources |
| Conservation International | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 45 sources |
| The Nature Conservancy (TNC) | implementer | 2007 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 43 sources |
| African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 42 sources |
| Jane Goodall Institute | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 36 sources |
| World Resources Institute (WRI) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 29 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2012 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| 527-A-01-00157 (cooperative agreement, FY2001) | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| EDG-A-01-00023 (cooperative agreement, FY2001) | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| EPP-A-08-00004 (cooperative agreement, FY2008) | 2009 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.