Global programs / Coastal resources management project (CRMP)
A workshop on the management of coastal habitats in Sri Lanka was held at the Sri Lanka Foundation Institute in May 1986. DEC abstract (PN-AAW-731)
Key prj:9365518
111 facts shown; 11 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 66 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program's four major goals are set out in the source document.1 The program works with cooperating pilot countries, which were selected as Ecuador, Sri Lanka and, tentatively, Thailand.1 The program is funded by the Office of Forestry, Environment and Natural Resources, Bureau of Science and Technology, U.S. Agency for International Development.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Sri Lanka, Ecuador, Thailand, Asia, Tanzania, Indonesia, Latin America, Philippines, Southern Africa, Oceania, Central America, Brazil, Bangladesh, South Asia, Australia, Uganda, Solomon Islands, Galapagos Islands, Malaysia, American Samoa, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Fiji, Caribbean, Middle East, Pakistan, Maldives, India.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Rhode Island. Coastal Resources Center (CRC) | implementer | 1985 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 54 sources |
| International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM) | implementer | 1991 to 1998 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAC-5518-A-5054 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 41 sources |
| PCE-5518-A-5030 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 33%; Nutrition 20%; Environment, general policy and planning 14%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the first year of the Ecuador pilot project : January 1-September 30, 1986 | 1986 | PD-ABE-991 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Midterm evaluation Ecuador pilot program : AID coastal resources management project, no. 936-5518 | 1992 | PD-ABF-275 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Responses to the terms of reference for the final evaluation of the coastal resources management project | 1994 | PD-ABJ-979 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 5 sources |
| University of Rhode Island. International Center for Marine Resource Development | implementer | 1985 to 1993 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| National Environment Management Council (NEMC) | implementer | 2000 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Tanzania Coastal Management Partnership (TCMP) | implementer | 2000 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| University of Rhode Island | implementer | 1985 to 1986 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Hikkaduwa Special Area Management and Marine Sanctuary Coordinating Committee | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| U.S. Dept. of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Ocean Service | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Bergen. Centre for Development Studies | implementer | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| University of Dar es Salaam. Institute of Marine Sciences | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Biological Consultants, Fiji | implementer | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Research Planning Institute, Inc. | implementer | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ceylon Tourist Board | implementer | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Rekawa Special Area Management Coordinating Committee | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Association of Southeast Asian Nations | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| 1996 to 2003 |
| Stated in a document |
| 12 sources |
| DAN-4111-G-9056 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PDC-5451-I-1027 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development Support | 1985 to 1994 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| Sri Lanka | 1985 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 15 sources |
| Ecuador | 1986 to 1994 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
| Ctr for Environment | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Tanzania | 1996 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Asia Regional | 1992 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Thailand | 1986 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Fiji | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Malaysia | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Philippines | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| South Pacific Regional | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Indonesia | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.