Swaziland programs / Commercial agricultural production and marketing (CAPM)
Project to stimulate investment in small and medium-scale commercial agriculture/agribusiness in Swaziland, and to promote increased domestic and export agricultural marketing. DEC abstract (PD-BBN-704)
Key prj:6450229
35 facts shown; 4 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 30 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program is described as assisting small-scale farmers in producing vegetables programmed in response to market demands.1 The program is described as a joint Government of Swaziland and USAID program to increase the agricultural sector's contribution to the national economy of Swaziland.2 Program resources are to be used to purchase and integrate new educational, laboratory and farm equipment into the restructured curriculum.3
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Swaziland. 5 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Swaziland, 1988 to 1996 30 sources
Scope: country: Swaziland. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 1989 to 1994 | Stated in a document | 20 sources |
| Hhohho Fruit and Vegetable Cooperative Society | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 645-0229-C-9019 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1989 to 1994 | Stated in a document | 19 sources |
| 645-0229-A-2010 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 35%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 24%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 15%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1992 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| South Africa | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Egypt | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Malawi | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Kenya | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Khulumela Kwenta Cooperative Society | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| University of Swaziland (UNISWA) | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AMEX International, Inc. | implementer | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swaziland. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives | lead ministry | 1993 to 1996 | Likely, not confirmed | 38 sources |
| Swaziland. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism | lead ministry | 1991 | Likely, not confirmed | 20 sources |
| Swaziland. Ministry of Education | lead ministry | 1989 to 1992 | Likely, not confirmed | 9 sources |
| Swaziland. Ministry of Finance and Statistics | lead ministry | 1989 to 1992 | Likely, not confirmed | 9 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Mission to Swaziland | 1989 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 27 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Swaziland | 1988 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swaziland | 1988 to 1996 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 30 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.