Global programs / Biodiversity support program (BSP)
Project to promote biological diversity concerns in A.I.D. and LDC programs worldwide. DEC abstract (PD-AAX-840)
Key prj:9365554
266 facts shown; 5 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 242 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Description: not available yet. When it is, it appears here with its source (IATI, a DEC document abstract, a cited summary, or one generated from the documents), never without one.
Operated in: Latin America, Ecuador, Africa, Morocco, Indonesia, Bulgaria, Mexico, Asia, Madagascar, Africa South of Sahara, Uganda, Oceania, Philippines, Caribbean, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bolivia, Papua New Guinea, Ghana, Guatemala, Central Africa, Nigeria, Thailand, Kenya, Nepal, Cameroon, Russia, Botswana, Panama, Costa Rica.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: region or province, district; squares are facilities.
Showing 8 of 11 places.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (WWF-U.S.) | implementer | 1990 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 99 sources |
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 2000 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 77 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHR-5554-A-8044 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1990 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 88 sources |
| DHR-A-88-00044 (cooperative agreement, FY1988) | 1990 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 84 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 32%; Environment, general policy and planning 13%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 12%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-term evaluation of the biodiversity support program [BSP] of the conservation of biological diversity project (936-5554) | 1991 | PD-ABE-062 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| BOSCOSA -- the program for forest management and conservation on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica implemented by Fundacion Neotropica : project evaluation report | 1992 | PD-ABF-158 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| African people, African parks : an evaluation of development initiatives as a means of improving protected area conservation in Africa | 1992 | PN-ABL-482 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| World Resources Institute (WRI) | implementer | 1991 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 64 sources |
| The Nature Conservancy (TNC) | implementer | 1991 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 63 sources |
| Associates in Rural Development, Inc. (ARD) | implementer | 2000 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 39 sources |
| Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) (New York, NY) | implementer | 1993 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 21 sources |
| African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) | implementer | 1993 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 19 sources |
| United States-Asia Environmental Partnership (US-AEP) | implementer | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulgaria. Ministry for Environment and Waters | lead ministry | 2000 to 2004 | Likely, not confirmed | 14 sources |
| Madagascar. Ministry of Environment. National Ofc. of the Environment | lead ministry | 1995 to 1997 | Likely, not confirmed | 8 sources |
| Madagascar. Dept. of Water and Forests | implementing agency | 1995 | Likely, not confirmed | 6 sources |
| Russia. Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources | lead ministry | 1994 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Chile. National Commission on the Environment. Technical and Administrative Secretariat | implementing agency | 1993 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 2000 to 2007 |
| Stated in a document |
| 79 sources |
| LAG-I-99-00013 (idiq, FY1999) | 2000 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 43 sources |
| AEP-A-92-00043 (cooperative agreement, FY1992) | 1993 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 15 sources |
| AEP-0015-A-2043 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 14 sources |
| AOT-A-99-00228 (cooperative agreement, FY1999) | 2000 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| OUT-LAG-I-800-99-00013-00 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2002 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| 523-G-00-00053 (grant, FY2000) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| PDC-0300-Z-8202 (other, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 278-C-02-00210 (contract, FY2002) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 690-A-99-00227 (cooperative agreement, FY1999) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAG-I-803-99-00014 (task order, FY1999) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAG-I-812-99-00013 (task order, FY1999) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAG-I-816-98-00005 (task order, FY1998) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAG-I-99-00019 (idiq, FY1999) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| OUT-LAG-I-815-99-00014-00 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-99-00003 (idiq, FY1999) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PDC-0085-I-9087 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| BAF-0421-P-2233 (pasa, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-5517-G-2049 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ctr for Environment | 1991 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 33 sources |
| Ecuador | 2000 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 26 sources |
| Morocco | 2001 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 23 sources |
| Development Support | 1988 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
| Bulgaria | 2000 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 15 sources |
| Africa Regional | 1992 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| US-Asia Environmental Partnership | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| Indonesia | 1993 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Cambodia | 2001 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Latin American Regional | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Uganda | 1993 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Madagascar | 1995 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Mexico | 1995 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Bolivia | 2000 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Nigeria | 2002 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Russia | 1994 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Rwanda | 1993 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Asia Regional | 1999 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Bangladesh | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Botswana | 1993 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Guatemala | 2000 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Mozambique | 1993 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Panama | 2000 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Papua New Guinea | 1998 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Philippines | 1993 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Ghana | 1995 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Program and Policy Coordination | 1993 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| A/PRE Regional | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Albania | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Armenia | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Azerbaijan | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Bosnia and Hercegovina | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Burundi | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Cameroon | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Central Asia Regional | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Chile | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Congo DR | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Congo PR [formerly Congo] | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Croatia | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Economic Growth Office | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Egypt | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| El Salvador | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ethiopia | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Fiji | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Gambia | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Georgia | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Haiti | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| India | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Kenya | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Kosovo (Serbia) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Macedonia | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Malawi | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Nepal | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Somalia | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| South Africa | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Southern Africa Regional | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Sri Lanka | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tajikistan | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tanzania | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Turkmenistan | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| United States and District of Columbia | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Uzbekistan | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Vietnam | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Zambia | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Zimbabwe | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Thailand | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 1993 |
| PD-ABK-246 |
| evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Mexico ecodevelopment program : mid-term evaluation final report | 1995 | PD-ABP-462 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Neotropical migratory bird conservation program : project evaluation report | 1995 | PD-ABM-238 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation par les beneficiaires du Programme Environnemental 1 (PE1) : ONE, DEF, ANGAP, ANAE, FTM, DOMAINES | 1995 | PN-ACB-632 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluating linkages between business, the environment and local communities : final analytical results from the Biodiversity Conservation Network [BCNet] | 1999 | PN-ACG-146 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluating linkages between business, the environment, and local communities -- final stories from the field | 1999 | PN-ACK-834 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Midterm evaluation of USAID/Ecuador's strategic objective 1 : biodiversity conserved in selected protected areas and their buffer zones -- main report | 2000 | PD-ABT-164 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| External evaluation of the Indonesian Biodiversity Foundatin (IBF) project : Yayasan Keanekaragaman Hayati [Indonesia] (KEHATI) | 2000 | PD-ABS-254 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Midterm evaluation of USAID/Ecuador's strategic objective 1 : biodiversity conserved in selected protected areas and their buffer zones -- synthesis of findings, conclusions, and recommendations | 2000 | PD-ABT-165 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| External evaluation of the Indonesian Biodiversity Foundation (IBF) project : Yayasan Keanekaragaman Hayati | 2000 | PD-ABY-903 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Projet pilote de developpement agricole integre en zones de montagnes b. v. [bassin versant] Dou Tama amont du barrage Abdelmoumen : rapport prospection des sites pour un projet de controle de l'erosion des sols dans le Sous-Massa = Site evaluation report for a soil erosion control project in the Souss-Massa[, Morocco] | 2001 | PN-ADB-268 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation analysis : summary assessment of EEPP tranche 1 implementation | 2002 | PD-ACG-818 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| USAID's global conservation program (GCP I) : evaluation report | 2002 | PD-ABX-997 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Evaluation du taux d'erosion au niveau de bassin versant de Doutama par le systeme d'information geographique (SIG) = Evaluation of soil erosion rates in the Dou Tama watershed using a geographical information system (GIS) | 2003 | PN-ADB-238 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.