111 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 37 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The BRIDGE project was scheduled to be implemented from July 31, 2015 to July 31, 2020.1The BRIDGE project's overarching goal is to support USAID and partners to better integrate biodiversity.2The BRIDGE implementation team comprised Development Alternatives Inc. (DAI) and three subcontractors.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Latin America, Indonesia, Caribbean, Madagascar, Mozambique, Africa South of Sahara, Southern Africa, Ghana, Africa, Philippines, Seychelles, Peru, Dominican Republic, Kosovo, Cambodia, Honduras, Jordan, Bangladesh.
Years
2014 to 2021 award start, end from document years
Implementer
DAI Global, LLC; Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI); Environmental Incentives, LLC; and 2 more 33 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment; OAA-I-14-00014; OAA-TO-15-00020
Purpose
The BRIDGE project's overarching goal is to support USAID and partners to better integrate biodiversity.source
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 1.
evidence countries (13): Indonesia 4, Mozambique 2, Madagascar 2, Peru 1, Cambodia 1, Honduras 1; top share 0.24, single-country share 0.18; regions -> global +2
sponsor central 28/28 evidence -> global +1
award office OAA (USAID/Washington) -> global +1
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2014. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 38%; Environment, general policy and planning 18%; Good governance 8%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
GovernanceDEC topic tag, PA-00M-Q4F, PA-00M-Q3N and 3 more, 2016 to 2020, confidence 1; 25 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
assessment6
Kosovo biodiversity analysis : Foreign Assistance Act 119 PA-00W-CZPAssessment 2018
Report on tropical forests and biodiversity in the Dominican Republic : Foreign Assistance Act 118 & 119 PA-00W-CZRAssessment 2018
Mozambique biodiversity and tropical forests analysis PA-00T-P8QAssessment 2019
Madagascar FAA 118/119 biodiveristy and tropical forestry analysis PA-00T-Q58Assessment 2019
Integrating ecosystem values into cost-benefit analysis : recommendations for USAID and practitioners PA-00T-D3QOther USAID Supported Study/Document
Biodiversity conservation advances global health priorities PA-00T-D44Other USAID Supported Study/Document 2016
The economics of ecosystem-based adaptation PA-00M-WXGOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2017
Case study : restoring coral reefs in the face of climate change in the Seychelles : an ecosystem-based adaptation approach PA-00T-D3ZOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2017
Evidence summary : ecosystem-based adaptation and water security PA-00T-D41Other USAID Supported Study/Document 2017
Biodiversity integration in practice : a case study of the integrated gorongosa and buffer zone project, Mozambique PA-00T-D3POther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Biodiversity integration in practice : a case study of USAID in Western Honduras PA-00T-D3ROther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Facts about Wild-Caught Fisheries & African Development PA-00T-D3SOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Case study : maintaining water security in Peru through green infrastructure : an ecosystem-based adaptation approach PA-00T-D3VOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Case study : improving ecosystem management to strengthen resilience to extreme weather in the Philippines : an ecosystem-based adaptation approach PA-00T-D3WOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Case study : conserving ecosystems to support climate resilience in Bangladesh : an ecosystem-based adaptation approach PA-00T-D3XOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2018
Thinking and Working Politically: Linkages and Lessons from Biodiversity Conservation PA-00W-QH6Reference Document 2020
Monitoring, Evaluating, and Learning from Biodiversity Conservation's Benefits Across Sectors PA-00W-ZTBOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2020
Lessons Learned from the USAID Biodiversity Integration Case Study Competition PA-00W-ZTCOther USAID Supported Study/Document 2020
training tool2
Better Biodiversity Integration Through Geospatial Analysis PA-00W-6Z5Handbook/Manual 2019
Supplemental Guide 4: Technically Strong and Politically Savy - Enhancing Thinking and Working Politically When Practicing the Conservation Standards at USAID PA-00W-S6THandbook/Manual 2020
unclassified3
Better Biodiversity Integration Through Geospatial Analysis PA-00W-6WX 2019
Better Biodiversity Integration Through Geospatial Analysis PA-00W-6X2 2019
Integrating Biodiversity and Sustainable Landscapes in USAID Programming PA-00W-CZJReference Document 2019