Global programs / Global award PHS-C-73-25 · 1977 · social policies, regulations and systems · American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
To discover how changes in women's status might influence family size, the lives of individual women in five villages in Kenya, Mexico, and the Philippines were studied. DEC abstract (PN-AAJ-908)
Key awd:PHS-C-73-25
10 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
To discover how changes in women's status might influence family size, the lives of individual women in five villages in Kenya, Mexico, and the Philippines were studied. Techniques of the study, the results of which are here presented, included life histories, census and genealogical surveys, participant observations, and social character analyses; data were processed with the DEMOG computer program. In Kenya, the histories of women in the Kikuyu village of Kiaguri were studied at 20-year intervals from 1896 to 1976. Research in Mexico focused on the villages, agriculturally rich and poor, respectively, of Santa Maria and Tierra Alta. Cotawan, a Muslim village, and Niwang, a Christian settlement, both located on Mindanao, were sites of studies in the Philippines. The women studied included those who had no children, those who had many, and those who had an average number. Significant results of the study are as follows. Relative income influences the status of women; women who contribute to the family income enjoy higher status than those who do not, although village cultures keep women subordinate to their husbands. Monetary demands of sending children to school are a more infl
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAJ-908 (1977). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Philippines, Mexico, Kenya.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 1977 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AID/CM-PHS-C-73-25 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1977 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Foundation | 1977 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 83%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 17%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1 source |