Global programs / Global award AID/CSD-1208 · 1967–1978 · agriculture
The data presented in this research bulletin No. 248 was derived from winter wheat grown in 1970 at 38 sites in 23 countries. DEC abstract (PN-AAA-089)
Key awd:AID/CSD-1208
30 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 59 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The data presented in this research bulletin No. 248 was derived from winter wheat grown in 1970 at 38 sites in 23 countries. Four of the sites were in the southern hemisphere. The same 39 varieties evaluated in the first nursery were grown in the second nursery. Twenty-eight varieties were winter wheats; two were spring wheats. Data on grain yield, test weight, maturity, plant height, lodging, shattering, winter survival, diseases, grain protein content and lysine content for 1970 are reported. Bezostaia again was the most productive variety over all reporting sites. It exhibited an unusually wide range of adaptation. Western European varieties as a group exhibited highly specific adaptation to the environments for which they were developed. Heine VII had the broadest adaptation among the Western European varieties. Hard red winter wheat varieties from the U.S.A. Bezostaia produced the highest test weight grain in the second nursery. Phenotypic expression of the high protein trait over diverse production environments was excellent. Lysine expressed as percent of protein was negatively correlated with protein. Varietal differences in maturity, plant height, lodging, disease resista
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAA-089 (1972). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Turkey, Uganda, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Latin America, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Ethiopia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nebraska at Lincoln. Dept. of Agronomy | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 1967 to 1978 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 59 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AID/CSD-1208 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 1967 to 1978 | Stated in a document | 59 sources |
| AID/TA-C-1093 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1978 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name |
|---|
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 51%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 29%; Macroeconomic foundation for growth 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Years |
|---|
| Basis |
|---|
| Evidence |
|---|
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 1978 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.