Regional programs / Africa regional award 72062419CA00001 · 2020–2021 · conflict mitigation and reconciliation · Mercy Corps
The goal of the program is to promote peace and stability in West Africa through the application of participatory community-based projects that seek to increase social cohesion between ethnic groups and, ultimately, resilience to violent… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72062419CA00001)
Key awd:72062419CA00001
15 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The goal of the program is to promote peace and stability in West Africa through the application of participatory community-based projects that seek to increase social cohesion between ethnic groups and, ultimately, resilience to violent extremist (VE) influence. The program will employ a suite of qualitative and quantitative research tools to measure the presence of social cohesion and resilience to recruitment by violent extremist organizations (VEOs) using a staggered evaluation design. The evaluation will target 40 villages across four departments of the Tillabri Region. PEACE will seek to establish a base of evidence about the relationship between social cohesion and resilience to recruitment by and support for VEOs in the region. In close collaboration of community members, the program will design small-scale social cohesion projects targeted to objectives such as increased dialogue between conflicting groups, improved collective action for local development, and better cooperation in management of natural resources. These small-scale projects will then be tested to determine their impact on social cohesion and resilience to VE influence. The program will work in close
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72062419CA00001 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Niger, Burkina Faso.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercy Corps | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2020 to 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72062419CA00001 (cooperative agreement, FY2019) | 2020 to 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 52%; Good governance 11%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.