Lebanon programs / Lebanon award 72026820CA00001 · 2020–2022 · social policies, regulations and systems
The Expanding Lebanons Labor Force (ELLF) Program is an initiative to be implemented on behalf of USAID/Lebanon. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72026820CA00001)
Key awd:72026820CA00001
10 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 4 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The Expanding Lebanons Labor Force (ELLF) Program is an initiative to be implemented on behalf of USAID/Lebanon. This 36-month, $2 million initiative will build and link to existing USAID investments in private sector development in Lebanon to integrate gender-specific, gender-appropriate economic empowerment elements in support of womens enterprise development. The ELLF Programs flagship is the womens enterprise capacity building and certificate program, which offers women entrepreneurs enrolled in other USAID-funded investments a gender-specific pathway to achieving a certificate in enterprise creation and growth. The ELLF Programs goal is that Lebanese women become effective catalysts of entrepreneurial development for their businesses and families in a time of economic crisis. A cooperative agreement with Lutheran World Relief (LWR) to implement the ELLF activity in Lebanon will start on July 20, 2020 for a total budget of US$ 2 million, with $1.5 million to be provided as funding from USAIDs Womens Global Development and Prosperity (W-GDP) Incentive Fund in Washington, and the remaining $500,000 to be provided as leverage/cost share from the implementing partner and/or other
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72026820CA00001 (2020). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Lebanon.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72026820CA00001 (cooperative agreement, FY2020) | 2020 to 2022 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 4 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 67%; Private sector competitiveness 9%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 5%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library