India programs / India award 7200AA19CA00041 · 2024 · family planning and reproductive health · Howard Delafield International
The overarching purpose of R4S is to strengthen generation and utilization of evidence to increase access to voluntary family planning and improve healthy timing and spacing of births. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-7200AA19CA00041)
Key awd:7200AA19CA00041
13 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The overarching purpose of R4S is to strengthen generation and utilization of evidence to increase access to voluntary family planning and improve healthy timing and spacing of births. In order to achieve this purpose, R4S supports two key areas of work: 1) research to answer priority implementation science questions; and 2) technical assistance to build capacity for data analysis, evidence synthesis, and adoption of evidence-based practices. R4S has three key results areas: Result 1: Expanded development, adoption and implementation at scale of client-driven approaches. Result 2: Improved understanding of the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of scaling proven and promising service delivery practices. Result 3: Increased understanding of how proven and promising practices enhance equitable access to high-quality, voluntary family planning.
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-7200AA19CA00041 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: India.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in India, 2024 1 source
Scope: country: India. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.714.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard Delafield International | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2024 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7200AA18CA00046 (cooperative agreement, FY2018) | 2024 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 7200AA19CA00041 (cooperative agreement, FY2019) | 2024 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name |
|---|
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Family planning and reproductive health 57%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 14%; Agriculture, subsector not specified 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Report of the outcome evaluation study for Go Nisha Go mobile app : new evidence from India | 2024 | PA-021-PF9 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Years |
|---|
| Basis |
|---|
| Evidence |
|---|
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2024 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |