Malawi programs / Malawi award 674-A-10-00035 · 2013
Improved health outcomes have resulted in people with HIV facing decisions about childbearing. DEC abstract (PA-00K-GDM)
Key awd:674-A-10-00035
11 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 2 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Improved health outcomes have resulted in people with HIV facing decisions about childbearing. We sought to understand the factors associated with desire for a child among men and women in Malawi. HIV-infected men and women ages 18-40 were invited to participate in a brief interview about fertility desires. Single variable logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with the outcome of fertility desire. Additionally, multiple logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of all the factors together on the outcome of fertility desire. In-depth interviews with women were performed to understand experiences with reproductive health care. A total of 202 brief interviews were completed with 75 men (37.1%) and 127 women (62.9%), with 103 (51.0%) of respondents desiring a child. Being in a relationship (OR: 3.48, 95% CI: 1.58-7.65, p = 0.002) and duration of HIV more than two years (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.67, p = 0.03) were associated with increased odds of desire for a child. Age 36-40 years (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90, p = 0.009) and having a living child (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.84, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of desire for a child. S
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00K-GDM (2013). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Malawi.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: facility, district; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Malawi, 2013 2 sources
Scope: country: Malawi. Signed by another country's office, but the documents name this country. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.75.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 674-A-10-00035 (cooperative agreement, FY2010) | 2013 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID | 2013 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Family planning and reproductive health 25%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 23%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 2 sources |