South Africa programs / South Africa award 674-A-08-00007 · 2013–2015 · University of the Witwatersrand
Background: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. DEC abstract (PA-00K-W6R)
Key awd:674-A-08-00007
29 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 4 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Background: HIV-infected women are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Women living in resource-limited countries are especially at risk due to poor access to cervical cancer screening and treatment. We evaluated three cervical cancer screening methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above (CIN 2+) in HIV-infected women in South Africa; Pap smear, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus detection (HPV). <br /> Methods: HIV-infected women aged 18-65 were recruited in Johannesburg. A cross-sectional study evaluating three screening methods for the detection of the histologically-defined gold standard CIN-2 + was performed. Women were screened for cervical abnormalities with the Digene HC2 assay (HPV), Pap smear and VIA. VIA was performed by clinic nurses, digital photographs taken and then later reviewed by specialist physicians. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive valves for CIN-2 + were calculated using maximum likelihood estimators. <br /> Results: 1,202 HIV-infected women participated, with a median age of 38 years and CD4 counts of 394 cells/mm(3). One third of women had a high grade lesion on cytology.
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00K-W6R (2013). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: South Africa.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in South Africa, 2013 to 2015 4 sources
Scope: country: South Africa. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of the Witwatersrand | implementer | 2013 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Right Care | implementer | 2013 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 39%; Tuberculosis 13%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| University of North Carolina Chapel Hill | implementer | 2013 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Witkoppen Hlth & Welf Ctr | implementer | 2014 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| University of Cape Town | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Dept Pathol | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| National Health Laboratory Service | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2015 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| 674-A-12-00033 (cooperative agreement, FY2012) | 2014 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) | 2013 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2014 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.