Mozambique programs / Mozambique award 656-A-00-10-0020600 · 2009–2016 · Johns Hopkins University - CCP
Key awd:656-A-00-10-0020600
32 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 23 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
In October 2010, the USAID Mission in Mozambique awarded the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs a four-year grant to implement the program.1 The program combines structural, behavioral and service related interventions.1 The program was implemented in collaboration with Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Comunidade (FDC) in the provinces of Gaza and Maputo.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Mozambique.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Mozambique, 2009 to 2016 23 sources
Scope: country: Mozambique. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins University - CCP | implementer | 2009 to 2013 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
| Johns Hopkins University. Center for Communication Programs | implementer | 2009 to 2015 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 656-A-00-10-0020600 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2009 to 2016 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 23 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID - PEPFAR | 2016 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 38%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 22%; Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 15%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parte 2: Novas Dinâmicas de Género | 2009 | PA-00K-XCG | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Estudo Qualitativo para Avaliar os Efeitos das Actividades de Mobilização Comunitária para Prevenir o HIV e Utilizar os Serviços de Saúde em Moçambique | 2015 | PA-00K-XCH | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 7 sources |
| Johns Hopkins University | implementer | 2015 to 2016 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Johns Hopkins Universiy-CCP | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Johns Hopkins University. Center for Communication Programs. Population Communication Services | implementer | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Conselho Nacional de Combate ao HIV/SIDA | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| FDC | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| HOPEM - Homens Pela Mudança | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins University - Center For Commication Programs | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ministério da Saúde | implementer | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 21 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Mozambique | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mozambique | 2016 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.