Global programs / African Strategies for Health (ASH)
Strategic health communication is an integral part of the programmes and development that influence decisions regarding health. Health communication is often integrated into public health interventions to improve programme outcomes.… DEC abstract (PA-00M-CSB)
Key awd:OAA-C-11-00161
35 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 76 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Strategic health communication is an integral part of the programmes and development that influence decisions regarding health. Health communication is often integrated into public health interventions to improve programme outcomes. Despite the massive donor funding for public health programmes in Nigeria, there is limited information on the current status of health communication programmes. This study aims to identify the knowledge gaps, describe the future direction and highlight recommendations for strengthening health communication programmes in Nigeria. Using a purposive sampling methodology, the online study used a two-staged Delphi Technique and the P-Process model to collect data from key stakeholders. Stakeholders included donors, government, civil society organisations, research institutions, education and training institutions, and communities. Descriptive analysis was done using SPSS. Capacity-building gaps were identified and a conceptual framework was developed. These gaps included: the low technical capacity of stakeholders in health communication, limited resources for organisations to implement activities, the lack of
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00M-CSB (2015). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Africa South of Sahara, Ukraine, Nigeria, Togo, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Ghana, Rwanda, Benin, Madagascar, Senegal, Malawi, Southern Hemisphere, Burkina Faso.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.8.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Sciences for Health (MSH) | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2012 to 2016 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 76 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAA-C-11-00161 (contract, FY2011) | 2012 to 2016 | Stated in a document | 72 sources |
| AID-OAA-C-II-00161 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2016 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Name | Years |
|---|
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 46%; Monitoring, evaluation and performance measurement 17%; Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 8%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| African Parliamentarians for Evaluation | 2016 | PA-00M-CTV | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Parlementaires Africains pour l'Evaluation | 2016 | PA-00M-CV2 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Parlamentares Africanos para a Avaliação | 2016 | PA-00M-CVG | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Basis |
|---|
| Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Africa | 2012 to 2016 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 72 sources |
Basis: read from a record field