Regional programs / Artisanal Mining and Property Rights (AMPR)
The Artisanal Mining and Property Rights (AMPR) activity will improve land and resource governance and promote responsible supply chains for minerals to mitigate against conflict, reduce flows into illicit financial networks, improve… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-7200AA18C00087)
Key awd:7200AA18C00087
30 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 35 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The Artisanal Mining and Property Rights (AMPR) activity will improve land and resource governance and promote responsible supply chains for minerals to mitigate against conflict, reduce flows into illicit financial networks, improve economic livelihoods and self-reliance for poor artisanal mining communities, support sustainable environmental practices, increase revenues from artisanal and small scale mining, and promote social cohesion, key U.S. Government goals. Among other activities, this activity will help establish and improve artisanal mining policies and laws, address alternative livelihoods and land use planning, provide training at the local and national levels, and work with artisanal and small scale mining stakeholders at all levels - from local communities to international fora. This activity will adopt a gender sensitive and multidisciplinary approach to address the development challenges associated with informal artisanal and small scale mining.
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-7200AA18C00087 (2018). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Central African Republic, Central Africa, Chad, Ghana, Africa South of Sahara, Burkina Faso.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.667.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra Tech, Inc. | implementer | 2018 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 30 sources |
| Tetra Tech ARD | implementer | 2021 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7200AA18C00087 (contract, FY2018) | 2018 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 35 sources |
| 7200AA18D00003 (idiq, FY2018) | 2018 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 34 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 46%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 12%; Private sector competitiveness 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapport d'Evaluation Participative des Comités Locaux de Paix et de Reconciliation (CLPR) et des Antennes Locales de Suivi du Processus de Kimberley (ALS) dans la Zone Conforme de Berberati | 2019 | PA-00T-XXX | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Concordis International |
| implementer |
| 2020 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| International Peace Information Service | implementer | 2019 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2019 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra Tech, Inc. | 2019 to 2020 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID | 2021 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |