Angola programs / Agriculture Development and Finance Program (ADFP)
The report begins with a brief review of the historical and contemporary context of the project in Angola. DEC abstract (PD-ACU-683)
Key awd:690-A-06-00099
21 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The report begins with a brief review of the historical and contemporary context of the project in Angola. It then presents an historical overview of ProAgro, including a presentation of the primary goals and objectives of the program. These goals and objectives are then analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. This review is based on documentary data collected, and observations made, by the author during a three-week visit to the program in late April and early May 2012. The final two sections of the report present the reviewer's conclusions and recommendations related to the program. The emphasis in these concluding sections is on lessons learned from the six years of CLUSA's agricultural cooperative development experience that can be applied to future such projects especially related to coffee and bananas in Angola and also to similar agricultural cooperative development projects in other countries. ProAgro has been largely successful in carrying out a value chain project that has benefited over 6,000 farmers in Kwanza Sul, Benguela and Bengo provinces. It has set the stage for increases in production and marketing for the future through its development of 25 cooperatives, 12
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ACU-683 (2012). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Angola.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Angola, 2012 to 2013 3 sources
Scope: country: Angola. Signed by a regional office, but the documents name one country. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.75.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA) | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2013 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 690-A-06-00099 (cooperative agreement, FY2006) | 2013 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Angola | 2012 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 56%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 19%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 5%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final evaluation of ProAgro 2006-2012 : lessons learned from six years of cooperative agriculture development in Angola | 2012 | PD-ACU-683 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Avaliacao final do ProAgro 2006-2012 : licoes aprendidas apos 6 anos de desenvolvimento cooperativo agricola em Angola | 2012 | PD-ACU-684 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Southern Africa | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angola | 2012 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |