Cambodia programs / USAID Wildlife Sanctuary Support Program (WSSP)
(Cambodia): Rapid degradation of forests due to a systemic failure of natural resource management and governance are undermining the political stability, economic health, and climate resilience of Cambodia. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72044218CA00001)
Key awd:72044218CA00001
13 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Cambodia): Rapid degradation of forests due to a systemic failure of natural resource management and governance are undermining the political stability, economic health, and climate resilience of Cambodia. The Wildlife Sanctuary Support Program works to improve biodiversity conservation and ecosystem health; increases sustainable economic opportunities; and strengthens landscape governance in two wildlife sanctuaries in Mondulkiri province. The activity builds the capacity of local communities and coordinates with Royal Government of Cambodia technical officers to better manage natural resources; supports the analyses and implementation of spatial plans to balance economic development while maintaining the ecological sanctuary's integrity; and, promotes alternative livelihood opportunities to reduce the dependence on the timber and non-timber forest products. The activity supports the Administration priority of ensuring effectiveness and accountability to the American taxpayer by using evidence to inform budget, program planning, and management decisions. The activity also supports the Administration priority of building self-reliance by increasing engagement with local partners
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72044218CA00001 (2018). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Cambodia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (WWF-U.S.) | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72044218CA00001 (cooperative agreement, FY2018) | 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Cambodia | 2021 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 44%; Environment, general policy and planning 23%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 13%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cambodia | 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |