Global programs / Strengthening elections and political processes
Presents an update by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) of its April, 1996 assessment of the electoral process in Kenya. DEC abstract (PN-ACB-189)
Key prj:9365468
87 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 27 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Presents an update by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) of its April, 1996 assessment of the electoral process in Kenya. Issues covered include: the domestic political environment and political culture; the work of the Electoral Commission (EC); new legislation; the effects of delimiting constituency boundaries; the status of voter registration; election administration (e.g., polling stations, vote counting); the role of NGOs and political parties; constitutional reform; and donor assistance. The present the assessment confirms the conclusion of the 1996 report that the Government of Kenya (GOK) and the EC will primarily determine whether or not there is a "level playing field" for the elections and whether the candidates and supporters of all parties will accept the results. By this standard, the EC is commended for its steps to revise and consolidate existing legislation governing election administration; its performance in administering recent by-elections; and its ongoing dialogue with organizations involved in civic education and election monitoring. Indeed, the opportunity for a productive partnership between the EC and these organizations exists for t
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ACB-189 (1997). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Haiti, Nicaragua, Russia, Indonesia, Mali, Kenya, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kyrgyzstan, El Salvador, Kazakhstan, Uganda, Latin America, Guatemala, Poland, Dominican Republic, Kosovo, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Asia, Central Asia, Europe.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI) | implementer | 1997 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Political competition and consensus-building 31%; Good governance 28%; Rule of law and human rights 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID grant no. AEP-5468-A-00-5037-00 to The Asia Foundation to provide support for a program in strengthening women's participation in election and political processes program | 1995 | PD-FEJ-638 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| AID grant no. AEP-5468-A-00-5038-00 to the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening to provide support for a program in elections and political process strengthening | 1995 | PD-ABM-466 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| USAID grant no. AEP-5468-I-00-6022-00 to Conflict Management Group to support the strengthening elections and political processes project in the area of alternative dispute resolution | 1996 | PD-FEN-265 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) | implementer | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) | implementer | 1995 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| University of Pittsburgh | implementer | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) | implementer | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| World Learning, Inc. | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research and Social Studies Association | implementer | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1995 to 1999 |
| Stated in a document |
| 6 sources |
| AEP-5468-I-6030 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| AEP-I-815-96-90006 (task order, FY1996) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| AEP-5468-A-5038 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-A-95-00038 (cooperative agreement, FY1995) | 1995 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-I-96-90030 (idiq, FY1996) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-5468-I-6012 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-5468-A-5037 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-5468-I-6005 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-5468-I-6013 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-5468-I-6022 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-I-96-90013 (idiq, FY1996) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| OUT-AEP-I-815-96-90006-00 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-5468-I-6014 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiti | 2000 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Ctr for Democracy and Governance | 1999 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Development Support | 1995 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Nicaragua | 1997 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Indonesia | 1997 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Kenya | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Mali | 1998 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Bosnia and Hercegovina | 1997 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Guatemala | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Kosovo (Serbia) | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| NIS Regional | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Yugoslavia | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Europe Regional | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Evaluation of USAID's support for the 1996 Nicaraguan elections through a cooperative agreement with the Inter-American Institute of Human Rights/Center for Election Assistance and Promotion (IIDH/CAPEL) | 1997 | PD-ABN-983 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Regional components of the democracy network program : evaluation of performance and potential -- final report | 1998 | PD-TAR-443 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Municipal decentralization and development project (MDDP) : interim evaluation report | 1998 | XD-ABQ-672-A | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |