Global programs / Small project assistance (SPA)
<div>This performance evaluation of the Peace Corps-USAID Small Project Assistance (SPA) Program focuses on the sustainability of grant activities funded under the SPA IV agreement (FY13-FY17) and the contribution of these activities to… DEC abstract (PA-00T-CW4)
Key awd:PPL-T-12-00002
24 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 2 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
<div>This performance evaluation of the Peace Corps-USAID Small Project Assistance (SPA) Program focuses on the sustainability of grant activities funded under the SPA IV agreement (FY13-FY17) and the contribution of these activities to fostering ongoing community-led development. The evaluation addresses six key research questions:<br /><br /></div> <div>1.What are the results of community-led efforts associated with SPA grant activities?To what extent are these results likely to be sustained over time?</div> <div>2.How and to what extent have SPA grant activities contributed toward catalyzingcommunities to identify, access, and mobilize local resources to meet their needs?</div> <div>3.What are the features of SPA grant activities that did and did not result in sustainedlocal capacity to pursue community-led development?</div> <div>4.What opportunities do stakeholders see to continue making progress on communitydevelopment after SPA grant activities have ended, and what factors might preventthem from doing so?</div> <div>5.What motivates stakeholders to engage, or not to engage, in community-leddevelopment efforts, and how can programs designed to catalyze community-leddevelopmen
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00T-CW4 (2018). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Philippines, Rwanda, Morocco, Peru, Malawi.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Programs that came before or after this one. A stated link names a document; a likely link is read from the text. Source: succession links
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALD-PPL-T-12-00002 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2012 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PPL-T-12-00002 (other, FY2012) | 2018 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 29%; Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 25%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participating agency program agreement between the United States Agency for International Development and the United States Peace Corps : small project assistance (SPA) program - SPA IV | 2012 | PD-ACW-313 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Evaluation : performance evaluation of the small project assistance (SPA) program, FY13 - FY17 | 2018 | PA-00T-CW4 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| U.S. Peace Corps | 2018 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment | 2018 | Stated in a document | 1 source |