Global programs / Social marketing for change (SOMARC)
Research recently conducted for an ongoing SOMARC social marketing program in the Dominican Republic has yielded a useful new methodology for empirically distinguishing the socioeconomic status of consumers in developing nations. DEC abstract (PN-ABE-605)
Key prj:9363028
24 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 5 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Research recently conducted for an ongoing SOMARC social marketing program in the Dominican Republic has yielded a useful new methodology for empirically distinguishing the socioeconomic status of consumers in developing nations. Such a capability is frequently needed for the social marketing process -- including determining appropriate market segmentations for products, determining which market segments are being reached in product sales, and selecting a useful range of participants for focus groups. This report summarizes the major aspects of the methodology, reviews its use in the Dominican Republic, and considers applications in other cultural settings. (Author abstract)
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ABE-605 (1987). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Ivory Coast, Peru, Dominican Republic, Honduras.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Futures Group International, Inc. (TFGI) | implementer | 1985 to 1987 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| The Futures Group, Inc. (TFG) | implementer | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPE-3028-C-4079 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 to 1990 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 5 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Population | 1985 to 1990 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Family planning and reproductive health 31%; Rule of law and human rights 22%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 11%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 5 sources |
Basis: read from a record field