U.S. Global Development Lab (GDL); OAA-A-14-00069; 367-A-16-00008
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 1.
evidence countries (3): India 6, Brazil 6, Indonesia 1; top share 0.46, single-country share 0.46; regions -> global +2
award office OAA (USAID/Washington) -> global +1
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2014. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Labor policies and markets 34%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 29%; Higher education, universities and scholarships 8%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
RecruitmentDEC topic tag, PA-00T-MQ4, PA-00T-P96 and 3 more, 2015 to 2018, confidence 0.999; 7 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
final report1
Research and innovation fellowships : final report (2014 - 2018) PA-00T-RJZFinal Contractor/Grantee Report 2018
policy strategy1
USAID POLICY ON PROMOTING THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS PA-00Z-6HFUSAID Operational Assessment 2021
progress6
UChicago Fiscal Year 2015_Q1 Report PA-00T-MQ4Periodical 2015
Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.