Colombia programs / Reintegration and Prevention of Recruitment program (RPR)
Reintegration and Prevention of Recruitment program (RPR)
<div>Esta evaluación surge desde el interés de la Gerencia de Monitoreo y Evaluación del Programa Reintegración y Prevención del eclutamiento (RPR) de la OIM por realizar un seguimiento a cinco indicadores mediante la recolección, análisis… DEC abstract (PA-00W-HWC)
Name source: not recorded for this programScope: country, ColombiaKind: program
86 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 204 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
<div>Esta evaluación surge desde el interés de la Gerencia de Monitoreo y Evaluación del Programa Reintegración y Prevención del eclutamiento (RPR) de la OIM por realizar un seguimiento a cinco indicadores mediante la recolección, análisis y presentación de datos primarios e información secundaria.</div> <div>Con una duración de 25 meses la evaluación abarcó 2,869 encuestas y 38 entrevistas. Los indicadores incluidos tienen que ver con niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA), personas en proceso de reintegración (PPR), comunidades e instituciones que participan del Programa. Las actividades se desarrollaron de forma simultánea para los diferentes componentes acorde con las dinámicas propias del Programa, las iniciativas y los territorios.</div>
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00W-HWC (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Colombia. 3 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Years
2015 to 2021 award start, end from document years
Implementer
International Organization for Migration (IOM); IOM 203 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Mission to Colombia; 514-A-15-00005; ID-514-A-15-00005
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: country: Colombia. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.9.
OU code 514 = mission Colombia
evidence countries (2): Colombia 202, Indonesia 1; top share 1.00, single-country share 1.00
Only tagged on documentsnot program locationsnot program locations
Basis: read from a record field
These countries are tagged on documents. A tag is not evidence that the program operated there.
Name
Years
Basis
Evidence
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2015. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 70%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 11%; Stabilization operations and security sector reform 3%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Virgin landDEC topic tag, PA-00W-GF3, PA-00W-KGK and 3 more, 2016 to 2020, confidence 1; 21 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Nota de Política Pública: Evaluación del Enfoque Diferencial de la ACR para Personas con Discapacidad
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library