Regional programs / Regional Agricultural Trade Expansion Support (RATES)
The purpose of environmental review is to assist the project planning and design team in identifying potential adverse environmental impacts due project implementation and management activities, and their appropriate mitigation and… DEC abstract (PN-ADN-352)
Key awd:623-C-02-00089
25 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 4 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The purpose of environmental review is to assist the project planning and design team in identifying potential adverse environmental impacts due project implementation and management activities, and their appropriate mitigation and monitoring measures. The emphasis is on incorporation of adverse impact mitigation and monitoring measures in the plan and design for ensuring that the project is environmentally-sound. This includes establishing linkages with the host country sectoral environmental guidelines for implementation of adverse impact mitigation and monitoring measures so as to minimize or prevent their occurrence. The USAID ADS 204 requires that the SO Team Leaders and the activity Development Partner's establish a monitoring and evaluation process for the project implementation and management activities so as to ensure that they remain in compliance to 22 CFR Part 216 environmental regulations. This includes review of program performance reports and undertaking of periodical field visits to assess the status of implementation and performance of recommended adverse impact mitigation and monitoring measures so that opportunities for timely modifications of mitigation measu
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ADN-352 (2003). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Africa South of Sahara, East Africa, Djibouti, Kenya.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2003 to 2004 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 623-C-02-00089 (contract, FY2002) | 2003 to 2007 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 4 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Africa. Regional Economic Development Services Ofc. (REDSO) East and Southern Africa | 2003 to 2004 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture, subsector not specified 28%; Trade and investment 19%; Macroeconomic foundation for growth 14%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2 sources |
Basis: read from a record field