Rwanda programs / Rwanda project 696-0103 · 1977–1983 · agriculture
GRANT TO THE GOVT OF RWANDA TO: 1)TRAIN 60 BLACKSMITHS AT THE NYABISINDU BLACKSMITH TRAINING CENTER (NBTC)IN THE REPAIR,MAINTENANCE & MANUFACTURE OF COMMON FARM IMPLEMENTS & UTENSILS; AND 2)UPGRADE THE NBTS'S BLACKSMITH TRAINING PROGRAM TO… DEC abstract (PD-BAC-568)
Key prj:6960103
18 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 4 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
GRANT TO THE GOVT OF RWANDA TO: 1)TRAIN 60 BLACKSMITHS AT THE NYABISINDU BLACKSMITH TRAINING CENTER (NBTC)IN THE REPAIR,MAINTENANCE & MANUFACTURE OF COMMON FARM IMPLEMENTS & UTENSILS; AND 2)UPGRADE THE NBTS'S BLACKSMITH TRAINING PROGRAM TO ENABLE A STEADY OUTPUT OF 20 TRAINED BLACKSMITHS PER YEAR. PROJ IS A FOLLOW-UP TO A SWISS-SUPPORTED PROGRAM WHICH DEVELOPED A BLACKSMITH TRNG CURRICULUM FOR NBTC AND TRAINED 66 PARTICIPANTS. PRIMARY COMPONENT OF THIS PROJ WILL BE THE TRAINING OF 60 PARTICIPANTS IN THREE,9-MO TRNG COURSES(20 PARTIC/COURSE). PARTICIPANTS WILL BE RECRUITED THRU ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR EACH COURSE PUBLISHED IN THE PREFECTURES & COMMUNES OF RWANDA. AN EXAM WILL BE GIVEN BY THE NBTC'S ADMIN STAFF TO DETERMINE QUALIFIED CANDIDATES WITH FINAL SELECTION MADE BY THE FORGE CENTER DIRECTOR. THE NBTC 5-MAN TRNG STAFF WILL BE COMPRISED OF SELECTED GRADUATES OF THE FORMER SWISS PROG. THE CURRIC & MATRLS DEVELOPED BY THE FORMER PROG WILL FORM THE BASIS FOR THE INSTRUCTION PROVIDED UNDER THIS PROJ. ONE TECHNICIAN WILL BE ASSIGNED TO DEVELOP THE EXISTING CURRIC, TRAIN TEACHERS IN EXISTING BLACKSMITH TECHNOLOGY AND USE OF THE REVISED CURRIC,MONITOR SUPPORT & GRADUATE FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES
Source: DEC abstract, PD-BAC-568 (1977). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Rwanda.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Rwanda | 1977 to 1983 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 1977 to 1983 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 4 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 56%; Program management, planning and administration 9%; Civil society 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| REVIEW OF AID PROGRAM IN RWANDA | 1979 | PD-AAG-389-A1 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| FARM HAND TOOLS | 1980 | PD-AAN-724 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Farm handtool/blacksmith | 1983 | PD-AAQ-494 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library