Regional programs / Latin America and the Caribbean regional project 596-0127 · 1987 · agriculture
Project to increase the production of cacao in Central America and Panama by establishing a regional cacao technology development and transfer network. DEC abstract (PD-AAW-547)
Key prj:5960127
14 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 2 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Project to increase the production of cacao in Central America and Panama by establishing a regional cacao technology development and transfer network. The Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA) will implement the project in cooperation with the Tropical Agricultural Research and Training Center (CATIE) and the Honduran Foundation for Agricultural Research (FHIA). A network management component will provide a mechanism for communication and effective regional collaboration on research and extension through joint programming of research and training activities, meetings and conferences, exchange of information, site visits, and interinstitutional coordination. This effort will be under the direction of the IICA; there will also be an Executive Committee composed of representatives of CATIE, FHIA, ROCAP, and national research and extension institutions and an Advisory Committee which will also include private sector processing companies and other organizations in the cacao industry. A research component will focus on three general areas: (1) the epidemiology and control of three major cacao diseases (Monilia Pod Rot, Blackpod, and Mal de Machete); (2) produ
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAW-547 (1987). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Central America, Honduras.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Regional Ofc. for Central American Programs (ROCAP) | 1987 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reg Office Cent America & Panama (ROCAP) | 1987 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 58%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 11%; Energy (power, fuels, renewables, efficiency) 11%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 2 sources |