Peru programs / Peru project 527-0265 · 1985–1986 · financial sector
Evaluates project in Peru to encourage local commercial banks to provide medium-term agricultural credit. DEC abstract (PD-AAS-573)
Key prj:5270265
11 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Evaluates project in Peru to encourage local commercial banks to provide medium-term agricultural credit. PES covers the period 3/83-3/85 and consists of a facesheet attached to a special evaluation (XD-AAS-573-A). Most major project objectives have been achieved except cofinancing. Within the first year of implementation, 11 commercial banks have been on-lending to 92 viable, well-planned and successfully executed projects, many of which involve new entrepreneurs in export-oriented ventures. By the midpoint of the project implementation period, one half of funds available under the loan have been disbursed to properly targeted agricultural activities. All of the 36 targeted Intermediate Credit Institution (ICI) personnel have been trained. Major recommendations of the attached evaluation are that: (1) USAID/P waive the Government of Peru (GOP) obligation to secure a $10 million cofinancing loan from a U.S. institution, as Peruvian economic conditions have made it impractical; the waiver will change the financial contribution of each project participant (A.I.D., the GOP, ICI's and subborrowers); (2) the implementing agency be required to charge the maximum interest rates legall
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAS-573 (1985). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Peru.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDC-1406-I-4088 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Peru | 1985 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 70%; Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 14%; Energy (power, fuels, renewables, efficiency) 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private sector agricultural investment Promotion (PRIDA) | 1985 | PD-AAS-573 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Mid-term evaluation report : private sector agricultural investment project (PRIDA) | 1985 | XD-AAS-573-A | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Audit of USAID/Peru private sector agricultural investment promotion, project no. 527-0265 | 1986 | PD-AAT-569 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1985 to 1986 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |