Haiti programs / Haiti project 521016902 · 1985 · agriculture
PES of a final evaluation (included in DOCID PNAAT266) of a project to strengthen the Union of Haitian Coffee Cooperatives (CCH). DEC abstract (PD-AAT-249)
Key prj:521016902
7 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
PES of a final evaluation (included in DOCID PNAAT266) of a project to strengthen the Union of Haitian Coffee Cooperatives (CCH). Evaluation covered the period 5/83-5/85 and was based on sample financial analyses, site visits, and interviews with farmers, co-op members and managers, and traders. PES includes findings from independent USAID/H assessments. The project fell short of expectations. CCH was not able to recruit the planned 5-member executive committee - only a project director and an accountant are on board; neither were trained sufficiently. Eight regional monitors were trained to provide management assistance to local co-ops, but have had only modest impacts; a 10/84 report showed unsatisfactory performance by half of the monitors. TA available from an ILO training expert was not fully exploited. Fundamental problems with the Pilot Center for Cooperative Coffee Exporting (CEPEC) critically affected the project. CEPEC construction, begun under project 5210083, is not yet finished and it is uncertain whether the Office of Promotion of Exportable Commodities (OPRODEX) will relinquish CEPEC title to CCH upon completion. Moreover, CEPEC experienced a large operating de
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAT-249 (1985). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Haiti.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from evaluation period; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiti | 1985 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 60%; Program management, planning and administration 20%; Energy (power, fuels, renewables, efficiency) 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strengthening coffee cooperatives (CCH) | 1985 | PD-AAT-249 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library