Brazil programs / Brazil project 512003703 · 1965–1970 · basic education
EVALUATES THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ELEM & BASIC EDUC PROJECT AS IMPLEMENTED IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE FOR THE PERIOD 1/1/65-6/30/68. DEC abstract (PD-AAS-795)
Key prj:512003703
15 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
EVALUATES THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ELEM & BASIC EDUC PROJECT AS IMPLEMENTED IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE FOR THE PERIOD 1/1/65-6/30/68. PURPOSE OF PROJECT WAS TO UPGRADE SCHOOL FACILITIES AND THE TEACHING & SUPERVISORY PROGRAMS. EVAL WAS CONDUCTED BY EXAMINING USAID/B & SECERN (SERVICO COOPERATIVA DE EDUCACAO DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE) RECORDS AND HOLDING DISCUSSIONS WITH USAID/B/NEAO OFFICIALS & THE STATE SECRETARY OF EDUC. LARGE-SCALE OBJECTIVES SET FORTH IN THE ORIGINAL PROAG COULD NOT BE MET DUE TO HIGH INFLATION, INADEQUATE CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY FOR TIMELY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, SECERN'S INADEQUACY FOR ADMINISTERING A PROGRAM OF THIS SIZE, AND DELAYS IN STATE FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS. SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS TO PROAG PARED DOWN PROJ TARGETS TO ACHIEVABLE LEVELS. AT TIME OF EVAL, 4 BLDGS (SR NORMAL SCHL, ELEM SCHL, INDUSTRIAL ARTS SHOP, PHYSICS/BIOL LAB)OF THE JOHN F KENNEDY INST OF EDUC AND 119 SCHLS HAD BEEN COMPLETED. BLDGS NOT COMPLETED INCLUDED A KINDERGARTEN AT THE JFK INST -- STOPPED AFTER BEING 40% CONSTRUCTED DUE TO LACK OF FUNDS, AND 29 SCHLS WHICH HAD NOT PROGRESSED BEYOND THEIR FOUNDATIONS. THE STATE DIVERTED A LARGE AMT OF USAID FUNDING AWAY FROM CONS
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAS-795 (1968). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Brazil.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from evaluation period; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Brazil | 1968 to 1970 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1965 to 1970 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 44%; Higher education, universities and scholarships 36%; Housing, urban and municipal infrastructure 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIT REPORT OF IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATION : STATE OF GUANABARA SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION | 1965 | PD-AAA-146-F1 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| REPORT ON EXAMINATION OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE EDUCATION | 1968 | PD-AAS-795 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TRAINING AND CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENT IN THE NORTHEAST (PERNAMBUCO) - BRAZIL | 1970 | PD-AAB-684-A1 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library