115 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 110 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program is implemented by the University of Florida Institute for Food and Agriculture (UF/IFAS) in collaboration with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).1The program's work plan states it was sponsored by the USAID Bureau for Food Security.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Ethiopia, Nepal, Rwanda, Burkina Faso, Niger, Cambodia, Kenya, Africa, South Asia, West Africa, East Africa, Nigeria, Asia, Africa South of Sahara, Horn of Africa, Togo, Ghana, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, Senegal, Liberia, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Benin, Gambia, Malawi, Ukraine, Latin America, Indonesia.
Years
2015 to 2023 award start, end from document years
Implementer
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems (FTF) (U.S.); University of Florida. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS); Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems; and 2 more 72 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Resilience and Food Security (RFS); OAA-L-15-00003; OAA-LA-17-00001
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 1.
evidence countries (22): Ethiopia 42, Rwanda 34, Nepal 34, Burkina Faso 33, Niger 29, Cambodia 23; top share 0.42, single-country share 0.20; regions -> global +2
sponsor central 77/77 evidence -> global +1
award office OAA (USAID/Washington) -> global +1
dropped Ukraine tag on 17 Africa-context docs (taxonomy defect)
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2015. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
LivestockDEC topic tag, PA-00S-X2V, PA-00S-X2W and 3 more, 2015 to 2023, confidence 1; 89 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Evaluation of the feed quality of six dual purpose pearl millet varieties and growth performance of sheep fed their residues in Niger
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library