Liberia programs / Liberia strategic analysis (LSA)
<div>This assessment examined a range of interventions aiming to improve biodiversity conservation in Liberia to better understand which approaches and interventions have been effective and led to sustainable outcomes. DEC abstract (PA-00W-K3K)
Key nam:liberia strategic analysis lsa
21 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 13 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
USAID/Liberia engaged Social Impact, Inc. through the Liberia Strategic Analysis (LSA) activity to conduct a Gender Assessment of the Liberian development context from 2009 to 2017.1 In June 2016, Liberia Strategic Analysis/Social Impact, with USAID/Liberia and the U.S. Embassy's International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Office (INL), used the Electoral Security Framework to conduct an electoral security assessment in Liberia.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Liberia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Liberia, 2016 to 2020 13 sources
Scope: country: Liberia. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Impact, Inc. | implementer | 2016 to 2020 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| International Business Initiatives Corp. (IBI) | implementer | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 669-C-16-00002 (contract, FY2016) | 2016 to 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 13 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Liberia | 2016 to 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 12%; Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 10%; Transport infrastructure (roads, rail, air, water) 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancing youth project performance evaluation : final report | 2016 | PA-00M-9N5 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Excellence in higher education for Liberian development (EHELD) final performance evaluation | 2017 | PA-00M-WXH | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Smallholder oil palm support project (SHOPS II) final performance evaluation : final report | 2017 | PA-00N-772 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 13 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberia | 2016 to 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 13 sources |
| 2017 |
| PA-00N-2F1 |
| evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation : Liberia agribusiness development activity midterm performance evaluation | 2018 | PA-00T-F6P | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Accelerated quality education for children in Liberia (AQE) : midterm performance evaluation | 2019 | PA-00W-5CV | linked as an evaluation of this program |