Nigeria programs / LEARN to Read
(Nigeria): With FY 2022 funds this activity will: .Improve reading outcomes for pupils in grades 1-3 in select Nigerian states; .Strengthen the capacity of the Nigerian basic education system to expand and replicate evidence-based reading… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72062022C00001)
Key awd:72062022C00001
14 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Nigeria): With FY 2022 funds this activity will: .Improve reading outcomes for pupils in grades 1-3 in select Nigerian states; .Strengthen the capacity of the Nigerian basic education system to expand and replicate evidence-based reading practices that promote quality teaching and learning, especially for girls and those from disadvantaged groups; and.Provide students with the foundational skills and abilities to progress to higher levels of education and become self-reliant citizens..In FY 2022, LEARN to Read partnered with federal, state, and local education officials to improve pre-service and in-service teacher capacity, and develop policies that strengthen the enabling environment for sustainable education reforms.This activity includes a small grants component to engage youth, especially young girls, in education development in their communities..LEARN to Read activity focus is on foundational learning including reading skills of pupils, especially girls, in grades 1 and 2 in the conflict affected northern states of Bauchi, Sokoto and Adamawa. A rapid gender assessment was conducted and the evaluation will include disaggregation of all people level indicators by sex and age
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72062022C00001 (2022). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Nigeria.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Associates International | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2022 to 2024 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72062022C00001 (contract, FY2022) | 2022 to 2024 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 52%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 17%; Telecom, ICT and mass communications 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.