122 facts shown; 5 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 279 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY IS TO FACILITATE SOCIOECONOMIC INVESTIGATIONS ON POTATO PRODUCTION AND USE IN PERU. THE 359 WORKS CITED ARE GROUPED UNDER SIX HEADINGS: JOURNAL ARTICLES, ARTICLES IN DOCUMENTS AND BOOKS, BULLETINS AND TECHNICAL REPORTS, DOCUMENTS, BOOKS, AND THESES. WITHIN THESE CATEGORIES, CITATIONS ARE ARRANGED ALPHABETICALLY BY AUTHOR. MOST OF THE WORKS CITED ARE IN SPANISH AND WERE WRITTEN BETWEEN 1902 AND 1975. THE CONTENTS OF THE BIBLIOGRAPHY REFLECT THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF EXISTING SOURCES ON SOCIOECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POTATO PRODUCTION AND USE IN PERU. THE AREAS MOST DOCUMENTED ARE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND CONSUMPTION PATTERNS. IN CONTRAST, POST-HARVEST TECHNOLOGY HAS RECEIVED LITTLE ATTENTION. THE WEAKEST ASPECT OF THE EXISTING LITERATURE IS THE GENERAL LACK OF QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION AT THE MICRO-LEVEL, ESPECIALLY FOR SUBSISTENCE PRODUCTION AND USE.
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAE-058 (1976). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Peru, Latin America, Andean Region, India, Africa, Pakistan, Egypt, Asia, Tunisia, Philippines, China, Central Africa, Indonesia, Kenya, Brazil, Argentina, Africa South of Sahara, Rwanda, Dominican Republic, East Africa, West Africa, South America, Papua New Guinea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Chile, South Asia, Haiti, Vietnam, Tanzania, Ecuador.
Years
1972 to 2004 years in documents
Implementer
International Potato Center (CIP); International Potato Center. Social Science Dept.; Indian Council of Agricultural Research; and 23 more 273 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Economic Growth and Agricultural Development. Ofc. of Agriculture and Food Security; AID/TA-G-1181; AID/DSAN-G-0079
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.95.
OU code 936 is a central bureau code (9xx)
evidence countries (39): Peru 135, India 10, Pakistan 5, Egypt 5, China 4, Philippines 4; top share 0.75, single-country share 0.67
dropped Ukraine tag on 3 Africa-context docs (taxonomy defect)
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Richard Nixon administration (1969–1974). Based on its first seen, 1972. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 61%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 11%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 8%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
PotatoesDEC topic tag, PN-ABJ-705, PN-AAE-307 and 3 more, 1972 to 2004, confidence 1; 205 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Evaluacion de la resistencia en papa a los nematodos del quiste
Evaluation of technology for production of seed tubers from true potato seed
1982
PN-ABD-706
linked as an evaluation of this program
Evaluation of agronomic technology for potato production from true potato seed
1982
PN-ABD-712
linked as an evaluation of this program
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library