Regional programs / Establishment of the Central American Development Coordination Commission
Project to support the establishment of the Central American Development Coordination Commission (CADCC) as a mechanism for promoting regional cooperation and unity in the international arena. DEC abstract (PD-ABD-372)
Key nam:establishment of central american development coordination commission
9 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Project to support the establishment of the Central American Development Coordination Commission (CADCC) as a mechanism for promoting regional cooperation and unity in the international arena. The Central American Presidents have designated the Permanent Secretariat for Central American Economic Integration (SIECA) as the agency responsible for establishing the CADCC. CADCC will operate as a multisectoral consultative entity with responsibility for: (1) promoting dialogue on key regional issues (economic, political, and social) among public, private, labor, academic, cooperative, nongovernmental and other sectors; (2) coordinating the development of regional positions on these issues; and (3) recommending these positions to Central American representatives to multilateral fora such as Partnership for Democracy and Development, the Regional Consultative Group, Presidential Summits, the Special Plan for Central America, and the International Conference on Central American Refugees.
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABD-372 (1991). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Central America.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Central America, 1991 1 source
Scope: regional. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Regional Ofc. for Central American Programs (ROCAP) | 1991 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reg Office Cent America & Panama (ROCAP) | 1991 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Trade and investment 50%; Good governance 20%; Program management, planning and administration 20%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1 source |