Mozambique programs / Efficiencies for Clinical HIV/AIDS Outcomes (ECHO)
(Mozambique): USAID/Mozambique proposes a set of TB activities that align with the national strategic vision and support the Global Accelerator targets of treating 40 million people by 2022. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72065619C00008)
Key awd:72065619C00008
11 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Mozambique): USAID/Mozambique proposes a set of TB activities that align with the national strategic vision and support the Global Accelerator targets of treating 40 million people by 2022. ECHO will increase demand for quality TB services by implementing household TB screening, monitor referrals for symptomatic individuals, provide treatment support through home visits, and host TB screening health fairs, thus serving as a major actor in the national TB response. Historically, USAID's efforts in these areas have contributed to 15-25% of the national TB case notifications, achieved treatment success rates above 90%, improved contact tracing, and increased provision of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) for child contacts of confirmed TB patients. To address poor IPT completion rates, the Government of the Republic of Mozambique (GRM) recently approved multi-month dispensing of IPT. With FY19 funds, ECHO will implement this critical intervention using patient- and family-centered approaches that facilitate more effective monitoring of patient outcomes. GRM has already initiated some small-scale research-oriented activities to consider 3HP (an IPT alternative) and ECHO remains
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72065619C00008 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Mozambique.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Mozambique, 2020 1 source
Scope: country: Mozambique. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abt Associates, Inc. | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 49%; Maternal and child health 18%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 16%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.