Guatemala programs / Digital opportunity through technology & communications partnerships (dot-COM ALLIANCE)
Final report of the Academy for Educational Development (AED), under a subgrant from Educational Development Center (EDC), on Phase II of the Enlace Quiche project (6/02-3/04), designed to promote bilingual intercultural education in rural… DEC abstract (PD-ABZ-798)
Key prj:5200431
19 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 2 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Final report of the Academy for Educational Development (AED), under a subgrant from Educational Development Center (EDC), on Phase II of the Enlace Quiche project (6/02-3/04), designed to promote bilingual intercultural education in rural Guatemala through the use of information and communications technologies (ICTs). Enlace Quiche has established 20 bilingual intercultural educational technology centers (CETEBIs) in and around the Quiche region of Guatemala. Of these, 12 are installed in or targeted to bilingual teacher-training schools, and 8 are in rural Mayan primary schools. The centers are being used by Mayan students and teachers to create and share didactic resources in Spanish and Mayan languages. A total of 45 school projects were carried out in 2003 and published in a 2-CD set and on a bilingual education web portal. Children as young as of kindergarten age are having their first experiences with computers using software in their native Mayan language. Complementing its work with schools, Enlace has worked with government and non-government organizations. Enlace built capacity in three partner organizations to create interactive digital multimedia CDs. With suppor
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABZ-798 (2004). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Guatemala.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: region or province, district; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 520-A-02-00109 (cooperative agreement, FY2002) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| GDG-A-01-00011 (cooperative agreement, FY2001) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 69%; Social services for vulnerable groups (orphans, disabled, at-risk youth) 9%; Energy (power, fuels, renewables, efficiency) 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| Guatemala | 2004 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |