Sri Lanka programs / Connecting Regional Economies (CORE)
CORE seeks to address the disparity in economic development between the conflict-affected Eastern Province and the bordering provinces of North Central and Uva, on the one hand, and the rest of Sri Lanka, on the other hand. DEC abstract (PD-ACR-570)
Key awd:383-C-08-00500
20 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 10 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
CORE seeks to address the disparity in economic development between the conflict-affected Eastern Province and the bordering provinces of North Central and Uva, on the one hand, and the rest of Sri Lanka, on the other hand. This is accomplished through an integrated approach: (1) that extends value chains broadly and deeply into the grassroots level; (2) that gives individuals the skills and knowledge they need to participate as entrepreneurs and workers in value chains; and (3) that improves the business environment to enable value chains to achieve greater competitiveness. The reviewers believe that the CORE project is on the right track and has made considerable progress over the past year and a half. It is ready to enter a "take-off" stage where many of its activities should begin to succeed and achieve the results intended. They also believe that the results in the next year and a half should demonstrate that the project should be extended for the option years, but that decision should be made no later than the middle of year three. This would ensure continuity of the activities and productive relationships with the private sector if the project shows further evidence that pos
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ACR-570 (2010). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Sri Lanka.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Sri Lanka, 2009 to 2012 10 sources
Scope: country: Sri Lanka. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AECOM International Development | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2009 to 2012 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 7 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 383-C-08-00500 (contract, FY2008) | 2009 to 2012 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 9 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Sri Lanka | 2009 to 2012 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Private sector competitiveness 41%; Good governance 10%; Agriculture: livestock, animal health, fisheries, aquaculture 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-term review : connecting regional economies (CORE) project in Sri Lanka | 2010 | PD-ACR-570 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Final performance evaluation of the CORE project in Sri Lanka (contract no. 383-C-00-08-00500-00) | 2012 | PD-ACU-297 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Final performance evaluation connecting regional economies (CORE) project (contract no. 383-C-00-08-00500-00) | 2012 | PD-ACU-425 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 9 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sri Lanka | 2009 to 2012 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 10 sources |