Kenya programs / Conservation of biodiverse resource areas (COBRA)
Summarizes interim evaluation (XD-ABN-164-A) of a project to increase the socioeconomic benefits of sustainable natural and wildlife resource management and conservation in communities surrounding Kenya's parks and reserves (COBRA project). DEC abstract (PD-ABN-164)
Key prj:6150247
24 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 5 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Summarizes interim evaluation (XD-ABN-164-A) of a project to increase the socioeconomic benefits of sustainable natural and wildlife resource management and conservation in communities surrounding Kenya's parks and reserves (COBRA project). The Kenya Wildlife Service is implementing the project. The evaluation covered the period 4/92-2/96. COBRA has made significant progress toward fulfilling its purpose. Buffer communities have benefited primarily through revenue sharing and, to a lesser extent, from enterprise development. Perhaps more importantly, community attitudes toward the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and the possibility of deriving meaningful benefits from community-based conservation have changed radically, especially in the project's focal areas: the districts of Kajiado, Laikipia, Samburu, and the coastal area south of Mombasa. The project's benefits have been derived from its substantial investment in communities that heretofore had only suffered the costs of living with wildlife; for example, $179,00 (Ksh 10M) was invested in Kimana Game Sanctuary, $260,00 (Ksh 15M) in Illingwesi Tourist Bandas, and $35,000 (2M) in Lurubae Cultural Centre. Only time will tell if t
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABN-164 (1996). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Kenya.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mpala Research Centre | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 623-0247-C-3002 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Kenya | 1996 to 1998 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 40%; Environment, general policy and planning 17%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 11%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation of biodiverse resource area (COBRA) | 1996 | PD-ABN-164 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Mid-term evaluation of the conservation of biodiverse resource areas project (COBRA) | 1996 | XD-ABN-164-A | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government of the Republic of Kenya | co signer | 1992 | Likely, not confirmed basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 2 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Africa. Regional Economic Development Services Ofc. (REDSO) East Africa | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Kenya | 1992 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1992 to 1998 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 5 sources |