Indonesia programs / Build Capacity for Adaptation to Climate Risks in Indonesia
Peatland fires occur almost every year in Indonesia and their impact is harmful to human life and the environment. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of peat fires, including hotspot characteristic, fire… DEC abstract (PB-AAB-117)
Key awd:497-A-11-00011
24 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 1 support mechanism (not programs) 1 data error; 2 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Peatland fires occur almost every year in Indonesia and their impact is harmful to human life and the environment. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of peat fires, including hotspot characteristic, fire period and spatial distribution according to biophysical factors and human activities. Characteristics of peatland fires were determined through spatial analysis between hotspots and rainfall and factors affected peatland fires such as land cover, distance from the river, distance from road, spatial plan and peat thickness. The study found that strong indication of peat fires in Kapuas is indicated by the hotspot with a confidence value of more than 50%. August to October is the hotspot increasing time in Kapuas because the rainfall is low. The densest hotspots are generally found in swamp shrubs, close to the river, close to the roads, in the very deep peat, with a spatial planning of peatland conservation area. The authors conclude that peatland conservation area and unmanaged land in Kapuas District were in vulnerable condition of the fire. They suggest to the government to improve unmanaged land utilization an
Source: DEC abstract, PB-AAB-117 (2014). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Indonesia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia University | implementer | 2014 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) | implementer | 2014 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Contracts and vehicles that served this program (evaluation, M&E, research). Never counted as programs. Source: document metadata
A support mechanism is never counted as a program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Higher education, universities and scholarships 25%; Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 22%; Good governance 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the Indonesia university partnerships : program: phase three -- partnerships #5-#8 | 2014 | PA-00J-RCZ | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| data error: fact without evidence Award 497-TO-12-00004 | |||
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2014 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Indonesia | 2014 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Policy, Planning and Learning. Ofc. of Learning, Evaluation and Research | 2014 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2014 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |