Global programs / African women leaders in agriculture and the environment (AWLAE)
African women leaders in agriculture and the environment (AWLAE)
Project (formerly 9300200) to create a matching fund to stimulate investment in women in development (WID) activities by USAID Missions and Bureaus. DEC abstract (PD-ABD-968)
Name source: not recorded for this programScope: globalKind: program
124 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 157 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program, known as African women leaders in agriculture and the environment (AWLAE), began in 1989 in six core countries.1The program's goal is to increase participation and leadership of African women at all levels of agricultural and environmental activity.2The program has three objectives: preparing women leaders, building an enabling professional environment, and creating sustaining mechanisms.3A USAID grant funded the program during 1992-1995 for $700,000.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Latin America, Caribbean, Asia, Ecuador, Middle East, West Africa, Africa South of Sahara, Kenya, Bolivia, East Africa, Africa, Uganda, Philippines, Honduras, Niger, Southern Hemisphere, Pakistan, Brazil, Morocco, Chile, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Burkina Faso, Ghana, El Salvador, Tunisia, Nepal, Central Asia, Guatemala, Rwanda.
Years
1989 to 2000 award start, end from document years
Implementer
The Futures Group International, Inc. (TFGI); Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI); Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI); and 15 more 120 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Research and Development. Ofc. of Women in Development; PDC-0100-Z-9044; FAO-A-96-00001
Purpose
The program's goal is to increase participation and leadership of African women at all levels of agricultural and environmental activity.source
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.95.
OU code 936 is a central bureau code (9xx)
evidence countries (42): Ecuador 8, Bolivia 6, Kenya 6, Niger 4, Philippines 4, Honduras 4; top share 0.09, single-country share 0.08
dropped Ukraine tag on 4 Africa-context docs (taxonomy defect)
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Ronald Reagan administration (1981–1989). Based on its first award year, 1989. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 62%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 10%; Program management, planning and administration 9%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Women in developmentDEC topic tag, PD-ABL-757, PD-ABI-227 and 3 more, 1989 to 2000, confidence 1; 105 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Evaluation report : Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA)
Evaluation of the cooperative agreements between PPC/WID and CID [Consortium for International Development and MUCIA [Midwest University Consortium for International Activities]
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
Women in development portfolio review : the identification of means to further promote the integration of gender considerations into USAID/Guatemala's program
Fourth quarterly report and interim evaluation for The Asia Foundation-Agency for International Development partnership program : increasing women's political participation in the Asia-Pacific region -- grant # 493-2750-G-00-3455-00 : submitted for phase I, August 31 1993-September 30, 1994