Global programs / Natural family planning and reproductive health awareness (AWARENESS)
Key prj:9363088
59 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 50 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Operations research was conducted by CARE India in two blocks of Sitapur (U.P.).1 The study was designed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating the SDM into community-based programs.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: India, Guatemala, Peru, Burkina Faso, Rwanda, Benin, Philippines, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Nepal, Pakistan, Haiti, Bolivia, Mali, Nicaragua, Africa South of Sahara, Haiti, Madagascar, Ecuador, Senegal, Honduras.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: region or province; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgetown University. Institute for Reproductive Health | implementer | 2002 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 50 sources |
| JHPIEGO Corp. | implementer | 2003 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRN-A-97-00011 (cooperative agreement, FY1997) | 2002 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 49 sources |
| HRN-A-98-00041 (cooperative agreement, FY1998) | 2003 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Family planning and reproductive health 64%; Good governance 6%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 4%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-term assessment of the standard days method (SDM) introduction in Rwanda | 2004 | PN-ADB-924 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation of the acceptability of the Standard Days Method(R) in the Democratic Republic of Congo : executive summary | 2008 | PN-ADL-885 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Design, implementation and evaluation of a distance learning course for training in the Standard Days Method(R) | 2008 | PN-ADL-889 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| CARE India | implementer | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Nineth Cameros | implementer | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2005 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Global Health. Ofc. of Population and Reproductive Health | 2002 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 37 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Global Health. Ofc. of Population | 2002 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ctr for Population, Health & Nutrition | 2002 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| India | 2004 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Guatemala | 2006 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Benin | 2005 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Burkina Faso | 2005 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Peru | 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Africa Regional | 2008 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Congo DR | 2008 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Nicaragua | 2004 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Rwanda | 2004 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Bolivia | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ecuador | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Haiti | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Honduras | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Madagascar | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mali | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Philippines | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Senegal | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |